The vegan nail vanish company you need to try
NAIL KIND is a Danish nail polish brand that is 100% vegan, does not use any animal-derived ingredients, or conducts any animal testing. Its only ingredients are minerals and plants. And is Halal compliant and has been certified by International Halal Integrity Alliance.
These nail polishes contain ingredients derived from plants such as potato, corn, manioc, and wheat. They sent us three beautiful shades to try: Skinny Dip, Flip Flop, and Popsicle Party.
Skinny Dip is a beautiful vibrant blue that is tranquil, cool and confident.
The tangerine hue of Flip Flop makes it perfect for sunny summer days. It can also be a mood booster on chilly days.
Popsicle Party is a bright red lolly that is super shiny and hard-wearing.
What we love about the brand
- Wide range of colour choice
- Quick-drying
- 85% Bio-sourced
- Natural origin
- Vegan & animal friendly
- Gentle on the nails
There are many exciting colours available, catering to every mood. These nail polishes are gentle and safe on the nails since they contain no toxic ingredients and are hard on the nails so they are chip-resistant and long-lasting.
As nail polish brands usually use toxic ingredients and chemicals, we appreciate the fact they use 100% bio-sourced ingredients. They are a brand that is striving to reduce its carbon footprint and be sustainable.
The brand is Style Cartel approved and won the Danish Beauty Awards Best Consumer Product in 2020, Best Nail Product and Best Free from Brand in the Beauty Shortlist Awards 2021, and silver at the Pure Beauty Global Awards 2021 for Best Vegan Beauty Brand.
The products are available at Superdrug and Amazon as well as on their official website at nailkind.com
Check out more beauty content HERE
before and after accutane Tamoxifen Raloxifene Anastrozole Incidence of BC reduced by 50 26, 959 77, 256 13, 338 Incidence of BC increased by 100 797 16, 271 3, 358 Treatment relative risks for breast cancer incidence set to lower 95 CI 5, 031 73, 744 1, 032 Treatment relative risks for breast cancer incidence set to upper 95 CI 19, 536 22, 858 16, 492 Adherence set to 100 6, 109 27, 956 561 Adherence set to 25 16, 601 53, 787 8, 064 Incidence of adverse events reduced by 50 9, 607 37, 296 2, 174 Incidence of adverse events increased by 100 9, 588 35, 028 2, 610 Treatment relative risks of adverse events set to lower 95 CI 8, 856 37, 878 1, 648 Treatment relative risks of adverse events set to upper 95 CI 10, 572 35, 597 3, 356 Costs of treatment reduced by 50 6, 409 27, 227 1, 490 Costs of treatment increased by 100 16, 001 55, 246 3, 962 Costs of adverse events reduced by 50 9, 604 37, 284 2, 176 Costs of adverse events increased by 100 9, 609 35, 130 2, 591 Costs of breast cancer reduced by 50 14, 529 41, 504 7, 220 Costs of breast cancer increased by 100 240 26, 691 7, 497 Relative risks of adverse events persist for 20 years after end of treatment 10, 146 35, 786 2, 493 Breast cancer treatment is associated with no chemotherapy costs 10, 146 35, 786 2, 493 Relative risks for raloxifene taken from the RUTH trial 4, 959
best generic cialis The IAAF does not challenge this decision The reason for the IAAF s intervention is that it disagrees with the committee s construction of the IAAF s prohibited substance list